Asset tracking works best when a mix of technologies are used together. As a general rule, the more automated and regular the updates are, the higher the cost. This means that it doesn’t make sense to have automatically updating location trackers on low value tools. Equally, using QR code asset management for vehicles that move around a lot is not a fit-for-purpose solution.
When developing your asset management infrastructure, you will need to consider the best mix of trackers for your set-up. To do so, you’ll need to get a strong understanding of QR and GPS tracking.
What is QR Tracking?
QR code asset management has become a familiar part of the modern world. The technology forms a major element of many organisation’s asset tracking systems. QR codes are made up of dots and black squares. These are unique patterns that represent sets of information,
After they are scanned, the information is transferred into a human readable state. In the case of asset tracking, the data is sent back to a central database that is accessible via an intuitive software.
QR Codes: Static vs Dynamic
There are two main types of QR tracking. Static and Dynamic. The information held on Static QR codes can not be changed. This makes them a perfect solution for storing fixed data. Information like where the equipment should be stored, when it was purchased, manufacturing information and the like.
Dynamic tags are far more flexible. With dynamic tags, the info isn’t ingrained into the code. The information can be updated as many times as required. For example, you could upload and subsequently change the maintenance schedule of an asset, and the scanner would take you to a webpage that shows you the most current information.
QR Tracking Strengths and Weaknesses
This approach is flexible and cost-effective. Using dynamic QR codes with a powerful software solution means you can update asset information at a click of a button. The physical tag can be printed on durable materials like vinyl and metal. So, they can be added onto most assets and be relied on to last.
However, QR codes require a manual scan to update a central database. They must also be visible so that they can be scanned. This means there is a risk that they can be tampered with or become unreadable over time. RFID tags do not need to be visible, so they are generally a better solution if you need to hide your tags.
The other key drawback of QR tagging is that they cannot give any information on the location of the item. That’s where GPS tracking comes in.





