PUWER vs LOLER: Key Differences in Equipment Safety Rules

June 5, 2025 • 8 min read
Image depicting the regulations of LOLER in workplace safety
Home 5 Blog 5 PUWER vs LOLER: Key Differences in Equipment Safety Rules

PUWER and LOLER are probably familiar words if you operate machinery or equipment in a UK company. Although these rules are the foundation of professional equipment safety, many companies find it difficult to differentiate according to their needs.

 This guide breaks out the principles of PUWER and LOLER, illustrates their distinctions, and shows how an asset-tracking solution could streamline your compliance path.

What Do PUWER and LOLER Stand For?

PUWER Explained

PUWER stands for the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998. Accepted on December 5, 1998, these rules replaced the previous Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1992 by including revisions derived from European directives.

PUWER sets regulatory requirements for equipment safety in practically every UK industry. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) enforces these rules on both new and old equipment. Employers, self-employed people, and equipment owners share responsibilities for reducing the hazards connected to working tools.

LOLER Explained

LOLER stands for the Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998. Introduced alongside PUWER, LOLER encompasses specific safety requirements for equipment used to lift and lower loads, including people.

What does LOLER mean in practical terms? It creates additional obligations beyond PUWER, specifically for lifting scenarios, recognising the unique dangers that lifting operations present. The LOLER meaning extends to accountability—employers must ensure thorough examinations, proper planning, and competent supervision for all lifting activities.

The Scope of PUWER and LOLER Regulations

PUWER's Scope

PUWER regulations cast a wide net, covering almost anything that could be considered “work equipment.” This includes:

  • Hand tools (hammers, screwdrivers, cutters)
  • Power tools (drills, saws, nail guns)
  • Manufacturing machinery (lathes, presses, CNC equipment)
  • Office equipment (computers, printers, shredders)
  • Vehicles (cars, vans, tractors, diggers)
  • Testing and measuring equipment
  • Pressure systems
  • Heating and ventilation systems
  • Temporary equipment like ladders and scaffolding

Importantly, PUWER regulations apply regardless of the equipment’s age, ownership status, or whether the employer or employee provided it. They cover equipment used by employees, the self-employed, contractors, visitors, and even members of the public in some circumstances.

The regulations establish four fundamental principles:

  • Suitability: Equipment must be right for the job, environment, and user
  • Maintenance: Regular servicing and repairs must keep equipment safe
  • Information and Training: Users need proper instruction and competency
  • Protection: Adequate guards, controls, and warning systems must be in place
Equipment marked with PUWER guidelines in a warehouse

LOLER's Scope

LOLER regulations create a focused subset of rules for lifting equipment, which include:

  • Tower, mobile, and overhead cranes
  • Forklift trucks and telehandlers
  • Vehicle-mounted HIAB cranes
  • Patient hoists in healthcare settings
  • Vehicle inspection lifts in garages
  • Scissor lifts and cherry pickers
  • Goods and passenger lifts
  • Lifting accessories (chains, slings, and eyebolts)
  • Attachments (grabs, hooks, clamps)
  • Lifting beams and frames

LOLER regulations apply wherever lifting operations occur—from construction sites to hospitals, factories, and retail warehouses. The regulations are concerned with four critical aspects:

  • Strength and stability of lifting equipment
  • Safe positioning and installation to minimise risks
  • Organisation and planning of lifting operations
  • Thorough examination and inspection at specified intervals

Unlike some aspects of PUWER, LOLER’s requirements cannot be modified or reduced based on risk assessment—the examination schedules and documentation requirements are absolute.

Key Differences Between LOLER and PUWER

Understanding what sets LOLER and PUWER regulations apart helps businesses implement the right safety measures without unnecessary duplication:

Legal Framework

PUWER: Implements European Directive 2009/104/EC (previously 89/655/EEC) and serves as the foundation for all equipment safety

LOLER: Implements European Directive 2009/104/EC (specifically Annex II) and functions as a specialist extension to PUWER

Equipment Coverage

PUWER: PUWER encompasses nearly all work equipment—from basic hammers to computer systems to complex production lines

LOLER: Applies exclusively to equipment designed for lifting or lowering loads, including lifting accessories and attachments

Inspection Regimes

LOLER and PUWER inspections operate on fundamentally different principles:

PUWER:

  • Follows a risk-based approach with no fixed inspection intervals
  • Allows employers to determine appropriate inspection frequency
  • Permits in-house inspections by suitably knowledgeable staff
  • Focuses on general condition and safe functioning

LOLER:

  • Mandates statutory examination schedules regardless of perceived risk:
    • Every 6 months for equipment lifting people (e.g., passenger lifts, mobile elevating work platforms)
    • Every 6 months for accessories (chains, slings, harnesses) regardless of use
    • Every 12 months for equipment lifting only goods (e.g., goods-only lifts, cranes)
    • After substantial modifications, damage events, or extended periods out of use
  • Requires “thorough examination” by technically competent persons with sufficient independence
  • Demands testing under load conditions where appropriate

Documentation Standards

PUWER:

  • Requires “suitable” maintenance records
  • No standardised format is specified
  • Records can be paper-based or electronic
  • Must be retained “for a suitable period.”

LOLER:

  • Demands statutory thorough examination reports containing specific information:
    • Equipment identification (serial numbers, asset IDs)
    • Date, time and location of examination
    • Safety-critical parts examined
    • Any defects found and their significance for continued use
    • Repair timeframes (immediate, within a specified period, or monitor)
    • Previous inspection history
    • Safe Working Load (SWL) verification
    • Examiner qualifications, signature and date
  • Reports must be provided within 28 days
  • Records must be retained until the next examination plus two years
  • Copies must be provided to requesting authorities (HSE)

Special Operational Requirements

PUWER:

  • Primarily concerned with equipment design, guards, controls, and stability
  • Focuses on preventing access to dangerous parts
  • Emphasises information, instruction and training for users

LOLER:

  • Introduces specific operational safety elements:
    • Mandatory marking of Safe Working Loads on all equipment
    • Position and installation to minimise risks (e.g., avoiding loads passing over people)
    • Strength and stability calculations for lifting operations
    • Formal planning for lifting operations, particularly complex lifts
    • Appointment of qualified persons to plan, supervise and perform lifts
    • Specific measures for lifting people (enhanced safety factors)

Enforcement Approach

PUWER:

  • HSE inspectors typically look for “suitable and sufficient” safety measures
  • Some flexibility in how compliance is achieved
  • Focus on risk control rather than specific technical standards

LOLER:

  • More prescriptive enforcement with strict timeframes
  • Little room for alternative approaches
  • Immediate prohibition notices are common for missed examinations
  • Higher expectations for technical documentation

Industry-Specific Applications

PUWER:

  • Applied universally across all sectors
  • Interpreted according to industry context

LOLER:

  • Has sector-specific approved codes of practice (ACOPs)
  • Different interpretations for construction, healthcare, manufacturing
  • Special provisions for offshore and maritime applications
Warehouse worker inspecting lifting equipment, following LOLER regulations.

PUWER Compliance Requirements

Achieving PUWER compliance involves several crucial elements:

  1. Initial Assessment: Verify that the equipment is:

  • CE/UKCA marked where applicable.
  • Suitable for its environment (temperature, moisture, dust)
  • Appropriate for the specific task
  • Robust Maintenance Programme: Implementation:

    • Preventative maintenance schedules
    • Fault reporting systems
    • Equipment-specific maintenance logs
    • Breakdown response procedures
  • Comprehensive Training: Provide:

    • Task-specific operation training
    • Refresher courses
    • Competency assessments
    • Clear operation instructions
  • Detailed Risk Assessment: Document:

    • Potential hazards for each equipment type
    • Control measures
    • Residual risks
    • Review schedules
  • Safety Measures: Install:

    • Appropriate guarding
    • Emergency stop controls
    • Warning signals and markings
    • Isolation procedures

    An asset-tracking solution like itemit can transform these requirements from administrative burdens into streamlined processes by centralising equipment records and automating inspection reminders.

    LOLER Compliance Requirements

    LOLER compliance builds upon PUWER requirements with these specific demands:

    1. Thorough Examination Programme: Structure a programme that includes:

       

    • Pre-use checks by operators
    • Interim inspections by qualified staff
    • Thorough examinations by competent persons
    • Post-repair inspections
    • Written examination schemes for complex equipment
  • Load Management: Ensure:

     

    • Clear marking of Safe Working Loads (SWL)
    • Load testing after substantial repairs
    • Overload prevention devices
    • Load stability calculations
  • Operation Planning: For each lift, consider the following:

     

    • Equipment selection based on load characteristics
    • Environmental factors (weather, ground conditions)
    • Communication methods
    • Emergency procedures
  • Detailed Documentation: Maintain:

     

    • Declaration of Conformity for new equipment
    • Thorough examination certificates
    • Modification History
    • Repair records
    • Near-miss reports
  • Personnel Requirements: Assign:

     

    • Competent planners
    • Trained supervisors
    • Qualified operators
    • Authorised examiners

    When Both Regulations Apply

    The boundary between PUWER and LOLER regulations isn’t always clear-cut. Many workplace assets require compliance with both regulatory frameworks, creating compliance challenges that need careful management.

    Common Dual-Regulation Equipment

    These everyday pieces of equipment must satisfy both PUWER and LOLER requirements:

    • Forklift trucks: These fall under PUWER as a vehicle (brakes, steering, visibility) and LOLER for lifting functions (forks, masts, chains).
    • Tractor with front loader/bucket: The tractor’s operation requires PUWER compliance, and the hydraulic lifting assembly requires LOLER compliance.
    • Overhead gantry cranes: PUWER compliance is needed for electrical systems and controls, while the lifting mechanisms require LOLER examinations.
    • Vehicle-mounted HIAB cranes: The vehicle itself falls under PUWER, while the crane attachment must meet LOLER standards.
    • Scissor lifts and cherry pickers: Subject to PUWER as mobile equipment and LOLER as personnel lifting devices.
    • Workshop engine hoists: These fall under PUWER as workshop equipment and LOLER as lifting equipment.
    • Patient hoists in healthcare: Require PUWER compliance for overall equipment safety and LOLER compliance for lifting patients.

    Navigating the Overlap

    When equipment falls under both regulations, businesses must address several practical challenges:

    1. Inspection Scheduling: The equipment may need:
    • Daily pre-use checks (PUWER)
    • Regular maintenance inspections (PUWER)
    • Thorough six-monthly examinations (LOLER)
    • Fault-triggered inspections (both)
  • Record-Keeping Systems: Must accommodate:
    • Maintenance logs for all equipment (PUWER)
    • Thorough examination certificates for lifting components (LOLER)
    • Defect reporting for all aspects
    • Repair documentation that may affect both regulatory regimes
  • Personnel Management: Requires:
    • Competent operators trained in both general operation and safe lifting
    • Maintenance technicians qualified to work on all equipment aspects
    • Appointed persons for planning complex lifting operations
    • Independent examiners for LOLER certification
  • Risk Assessments: Need to consider:
    • General operational risks (PUWER)
    • Specific lifting operation risks (LOLER)
    • The interaction between different equipment functions
    • Environmental factors affecting both aspects

    Practical Compliance Strategies

    When managing equipment subject to both regulations, consider these approaches:

    1. Integrated Documentation: Create comprehensive equipment files organised by equipment ID that include both PUWER maintenance records and LOLER examination certificates.
    2. Coordinated Scheduling: Align PUWER maintenance schedules with LOLER examination dates where possible to reduce equipment downtime.
    3. Digital Asset Management: Implement an asset tracking solution like itemit that can differentiate between PUWER and LOLER requirements while maintaining links between related records.
    4. Component Tagging: Individually identify and tag lifting components within larger equipment assemblies to clarify which parts need LOLER examinations.
    5. Cross-Trained Personnel: Ensure maintenance staff understand both regulatory requirements and how they interact with specific equipment.
    Visual of safety equipment with both LOLER and PUWER compliance marks.

    Managing Compliance with Asset Tracking

    Keeping track of multiple regulatory requirements across numerous pieces of equipment can quickly become overwhelming. The itemit asset tracking solution offers practical tools to manage this complexity:

    1. Centralised Records: Store all equipment documentation in one secure digital location accessible to authorised personnel.
    2. Automatic Scheduling: Set up customised alerts for maintenance tasks, inspections, and examinations based on usage or calendar dates.
    3. Mobile Inspections: Complete inspection forms on-site using mobile devices, capturing photos of issues and creating immediate maintenance requests.
    4. Equipment Lifecycle Tracking: Monitor each asset from acquisition through to disposal, including all maintenance activities and compliance checks.
    5. Real-time Reporting: Generate compliance status reports instantly to demonstrate due diligence during audits or inspections.

    Implementing an asset-tracking solution helps with compliance and provides valuable insights into equipment performance and maintenance costs.

    Managing Compliance with Asset Tracking

    Keeping track of multiple regulatory requirements across numerous pieces of equipment can quickly become overwhelming. The itemit asset tracking solution offers practical tools to manage this complexity:

    1. Centralised Records: Store all equipment documentation in one secure digital location accessible to authorised personnel.

    2. Automatic Scheduling: Set up customised alerts for maintenance tasks, inspections, and examinations based on usage or calendar dates.

    3. Mobile Inspections: Complete inspection forms on-site using mobile devices, capturing photos of issues and creating immediate maintenance requests.

    4. Equipment Lifecycle Tracking: Monitor each asset from acquisition through to disposal, including all maintenance activities and compliance checks.

    5. Real-time Reporting: Generate compliance status reports instantly to demonstrate due diligence during audits or inspections.

    Implementing an asset-tracking solution helps with compliance and provides valuable insights into equipment performance and maintenance costs.

    The Consequences of Non-Compliance

    Failing to meet PUWER and LOLER regulations can have serious ramifications:

    1. HSE Enforcement: The Health and Safety Executive can issue improvement notices, prohibition notices, or prosecute for serious breaches.

    2. Financial Penalties: Courts can impose unlimited fines based on company turnover and the severity of non-compliance.

    3. Operational Disruption: Inspections can take equipment out of service, causing project delays and production losses.

    4. Reputational Damage: Public prosecutions and worker injuries can severely harm a company’s reputation and client relationships.

    5. Civil Claims: Injuries resulting from non-compliant equipment can lead to costly compensation claims.

    Safeguarding Your Workplace: The Path Forward

    Understanding the differences between PUWER and LOLER is just the beginning. To create a truly safe workplace, businesses must build compliance into their everyday operations rather than treating it as a separate administrative task.

    By combining thorough equipment knowledge, regular training, and systematic record-keeping through an asset-tracking solution like itemit, businesses can turn regulatory compliance from a challenge into a competitive advantage.

    Proper PUWER compliance doesn’t just protect workers—it protects your business from costly downtime, legal issues, and reputation damage. Similarly, comprehensive LOLER and PUWER inspections ensure that your equipment operates safely and efficiently throughout its lifecycle.

    Ready to simplify your approach to equipment compliance? Discover how the itemit asset tracking solution can transform your PUWER and LOLER management processes. Contact our team today to see how we can help you maintain compliance without the administrative burden.

    Itemit App

    Try itemit

    Choose a better way to track
    your assets.
    Start your free 14-day trial now!

    Dr. Alex Wong

    Article by

    Dr. Alex Wong is the CEO & Co-Founder of RedBite Solutions, a spin-out from the University of Cambridge and creators of itemit.For more than 2 decades, Alex’s innovations have disrupted industries and reimagined traditional solutions, delivering breakthrough results.A pioneer of the RFID EPC Network and IoT, Alex has shaped modern tracking technologies. RedBite powers the world’s largest RFID deployment across 60+ countries and launched itemit, a leading barcode, QR code, GPS & RFID SaaS tracking platform. Dr. Wong holds a PhD in Engineering from Cambridge and remains an embedded researcher, leading EU & Innovate UK projects to bridge research with real-world applications.

    Choose a better way to track your assets

    Start your free 14-day trial now. Instant access. 
No credit card details required.

    Keep Learning

    itemit Blog

    Tips, guides, industry best practices, and news.